|
Leaderboards
|
What Counts as a View? (Updated)"View" testing for various online video sites Monday 19th of May 2008 12:00:00 AM This study was initially released last June to great reception from both media and content creators. Here, we update the study using the same methodology (and a few sites added) to reflect current conditions, noting changes since last time in the Conclusion section.I. Research Abstract II. Methodology
All tests were run from a static IP address on a single computer between 4/15/08 and 5/14/08 logged into an account different from the video author's for each site. For stricter sites, we also tested resetting the cache or being logged out. Where available, "Private" settings were utilized to prevent others from viewing the test video. The text for the title, meta-tags and description of the test video were all jibberish (reading: "prozhectblinque") to prevent anyone from stumbling onto the video, although this turned out not to be a problem in most cases. III. Summary of Findings
Site specifics:
Blip - Blip only logs one view per IP address per session, regardless of whether the cache is cleared after each play or the user is logged in or out of the site. Given that constraint, however, once the video starts playing, a view is logged whether the video is viewed in part or in full. The video used in testing was public (Blip charges for a "Private" setting), but it is clear from the data that no one else viewed the video. Initially, we thought that Blip was not counting embedded video views, but upon review this is incorrect. As in all settings, Blip counts one view per IP address per session. Crackle - Basically, once the player starts, Crackle counts a view. Crackle logged "views" for all categories tested, including refresh, >1/2 view, full view and an embedded view. Crackle does not offer a "private" setting, but it can be inferred from the data that no one outside of our testing group viewed the video.
Howcast - Video was marked "Private" to
prevent others from finding it via search or by browsing the site. Refresh, >1/2 and full views were all counted. Howcast counts views from embedded videos separately.
Sclipo - All
tested categories resulted in views counted, including embedded views. Sclipo does not offer a "Private" setting, so this video was live during testing. Stupidvideos - All tested categories resulted in views counted, including embedded views. Stupidvideos does not offer a "Private" setting, so this video was live during testing. However, there was little to no outside influence on the view count. Veoh - All tested categories resulted in views counted, including embedded views. Veoh does not offer a "Private" setting, so this video was live during testing. The video was not added to the profile's favorites page, however, and there was little to no outside influence on the view count.
Viddler - Video was marked "Private" to prevent others from finding it via search or by browsing the site. All tested categories resulted in views counted, including embedded views.
Yahoo! Video - Yahoo! does not provide a "Private" setting for videos, so there was no control over views counted for the test. However, there was little to no outside influence on the view count. Despite their former restrictive standards (Yahoo! as of last June did not count embedded or partial views), all categories tested resulted in views counted.
Conclusions: A Standard Begins To Emerge Interestingly, both Youtube and Yahoo! lessened their standards since last June, when this study was first published. Previously, Youtube only logged one view per IP address unless the video was viewed in full. Youtube also formerly counted only one maximum view for an embedded video, no matter how many times it was played from a single IP address. Now, Youtube counts everything once the video starts playing. Yahoo!'s recently re-launched video site reflects similar changes. It appears that Blip and Metacafe are lone holdouts to a stricter, IP address-based standard. There is also some spotty disagreement (DailyMotion) on whether to count embedded views and how they are counted. That said, the lack of standardization presents complexity to content producers and advertisers in understanding the relative popularity of videos across video sites. To fully realize the potential of advertising models in the online video medium, increased standardization and transparency is required. Please feel free to republish or quote from this in any form as long as you give us attribution and a link to our homepage.
For more information, contact: |